BRC-20 Tokens vs. ERC-20 Tokens
Millions of tokens can be found in the cryptocurrency market, many of which are constructed with the help of extensively utilized and trusted token standards. ERC-20 on the Ethereum network stands out as one of the most prevalent standards, with over a million tokens created employing it. BRC-20 is its experimental counterpart created for the Bitcoin blockchain. It has not yet gained much traction due to the age and relative isolation of the Bitcoin ecosystem. How similar are these two standards, and what are the chances of BRC-20 gaining significant popularity in the coming years?
Despite their similar names, noticeable differences exist between the two. First and foremost, the ERC-20 standard for tokens is widely known. Its versatility and widespread approval have made it a preferred option for many developers and projects looking to establish new tokens and platforms within the Ethereum ecosystem. In contrast, the BRC-20 standard is in the early stages of its journey, and its capabilities and prospects have yet to be fully realized.
Moreover, ERC-20 is notable for its built-in flexibility, allowing companies to customize tokens for specific purposes. This adaptability guarantees more tailored functionality and creates opportunities for a wide range of potential applications. Conversely, BRC-20 tokens pose difficulties in accommodating diverse use cases and thus have significantly fewer capabilities. The network's contributors and supporters may go around it by finding use cases and crypto sectors that fit perfectly together. Only time will tell if this development tactic succeeds.
Learn more on the Kinetex blog.
Try swapping with Kinetex dApp!