Amir Alibekuly

u

2020-12-01T15:39:04.817Z

In the era of globalization and modern technologies the number of people, who assert that governments and individuals should spend money to crusial issues in society, instead of protecting animals and their habitat have increased. I am a strong advocate of this approach and I claim that issues in society more paramount than animals.

First of all, numerous studies have consistently found that health care the most important issue in this decade. The main reason is that some ages groups of people such as kids and olders do not have suitable health, based on this governments and individuals should financial to their health. Moreover, if these both provided sponsors had to start invest to health of old people and kids, global government would have plethora of healthy people. From my point of view, people who have stable health more necessary in this decade than animals and their habitat.

Secondly, it is justifiable to say that a lot of people throughout the world do not have money to gain in foothold in the global marketplace. To illustrate, government of Barbados have been spending money to solve problem with proverty and right now this country the richest. If some countries start to invest money to solving problem with proverty, these countries will have satisfactory feedback. In my opinion, proverty is the most paramount problem in this time.

In conclusion, this essay acknowledges that protecting animals and their habitat is unnecessary. As far as I concerned, if governments and individuals had invested money to issuses in society long ago, now governments would have numerous healthy and not poor people.

task 2

2020-11-04T15:00:20.350Z

In the era of globalization and modern technologies the number of people, who assert that daily sport exercise is suitable way to improve health have increased. I am strong advocate of this statement and the objective of this essay is compare and examine provided approach.

First of all, numerous studies have consistently found that sport exercise such as bodybuilding and single training are paramount for human health. Moreover, if people did sport exercises every day, they would be able to have satisfactory part of body such as chests, shoulders, arms and good health. To illustrate, this type of training boost testosterone and provide acceptable antivirus versus bacterias. From my point of view, good health and satisfactory body are crucial in this decade.

Secondly, it is justifiable to say that the best way to enhance health is doing sport exercise because these types of exercises have acceptable body load, based on this human body has good security versus numerous viruses and bacterias. Furthermore, the vast majority of people throughout the world have been improving their body after situation with coronavirus. For instance, if people always train, these people will have suitable protection from antibodies. In my opinion, people should train every day because it is important for their health.

In conclusion, this essay acknowledges that the best way to enhance heath is training daily. As far as I concerned, despite the fact that human body can defend yourself, if people had started training every day long ago, now this people would have satisfactory health.

task 1

2020-11-04T14:28:14.822Z

The table demonstrates persentage of income adults and children spent on 4 common items such as food, electronic equipment, music and videos in the UK in one period (1998).

Overall, according to the provided information, adults, men and women had similar persentage on music item (5%). Music was the dominant type of item for boys and girls (38% and 39%) while food was less preferred (20 percent for two)

In the firts age group (adults, men, women), the biggest persentage was on food item(about 80 persent for free items). However people from this age group used to spent a least on videos, they similar spent less than 3 persent. Likewise, electronic equipment and music items had almost similar proportion from adults.

Uk had satisfactory proceeds from 38 to 40 procents from music on second age group (children, boys and girls). Nevertheless, people from this age group used to spent least money to food than to other items (about 20 persent)

food

2020-11-03T14:11:14.202Z

In the era of globalization and modern technologies the number of individuals, who prefer to eat fast food have increased. The objective of this essay is to examine and compare both sides and point out own opinion.

First of all, numerous studies have consistenly found that the vast majority of people prefer fast foods because costs of these cuisines are less than others. Moreover, fast food is avaliable for all ages groups and people have been preferring to eat fast food since 2010 because of siutable costs. For instance, numerous people throughout the world do not have money for healthy food, based on this people more prefer fast food. From my point of view, low prises of these types of food is satisfactory positive aspect.

Secondly, it is justifiable to say that fast food is harmful for human body because this type of food has plethora of GMO and other noxios products. Furthermore, according to the provided information by New Your Times, if a person always eat fast food, he or she will not be a healthy because of unstable diet program. To illustrate, the vast majority of people, who have ate harmful food now cannot training. In my opinion, people should have suitable diet and should stop eating fast food.

In conclusion, this essay acknowledges that fast food has a lot of negative aspects. As far as I concerned, despite the fact that fast food is available for all individuals, if people had stopped eat harmful food long ago, now they would have healthy bodies.

task 2

2020-11-02T16:11:01.206Z

In the era of globalization and modern technologies the number of individuals, who assert that overpopulation in numerous urban centers throughout the world is a major problem have increased. Possible solutions would be a suitable plan to provide new jobs and conditions of live for people.

One of the reasons why people choose big sities for migration is stable economy situation, and suitable education. It is justifiable to say that plethora of urban centers do not have good conditions for life such as education, medicine and workplaces, based on this people migrate to big cities. Moreover, if government provided these types if conditions, people would not migrate to major urban centers. For instance, people from Russia had been migrating to Ukraine until 2012 because second country have dominated on conditions of live.

Another problem that needs to be considered is a unstable economy situation on numerous countries. According to provided information by New York Times, the vast majority of people have been preferring countries, which trying to gain foodhold on the global marketplace after collapse of the USSR. To illustrate, numerous people from Belarus cannot work on their native country because of unstable econony situation. Numerous studies have consistently found that if countries do not have problems with marketplace, people do not migrate to anothers countries.

In conclusion, this essay acknowledges that overpopulation is a major problem. As far as I concerned, despite the fact that numerous global centers have problems with overpopulation, if government had had stable conditions for life long ago, now some countries would not have problems with overpopulation.

pie charts

2020-11-02T06:03:53.658Z

The pie charts demonstrate total value (in Billions of Dollars) and sources of fish, which was imported to the USA in 1988, 1992 and 2000 from China, Canada and other countries.

Overall, the value of fish have increased almost double between provided periods from 6.57 billion dollars in 1988 to 10.72 in 2000 and China have gived the sourse of fish less than others resources.

At the start of the period, sources of fish which provided Canada was 60%. Likewise, Canada gived more than China and other countries almost double (13% and 27%)

At the end of the period, the total value was 10.72 billion dollars. According to the provided information by last pie chart, other countries have gived 42%. The percentage from Canada and China was 28 and 30% and source of fish which provided Canada fall from 60% in 1988 to 28 in 2002.

ok

2020-10-21T20:35:14.934Z

In the era of globalization and modern tecnologies the number of individuals who claim that people should recheck thier driving skills every five years have increased. The objective of this essay is to examine and compare positive and negative aspects of this approach.

First of all, To begin with negative aspect, numerous studies have consistently found that when drivers retake thier driving test they feel discomfort. Moreover, if a person passed plethora of test such as driving test or quiz which chech knowledge of driving rules, he or she would feel mini-depression. To illustrate, numerous governments of countries throughout the world have been anticipating that people should not retake driving test since 2010. From my point of view, people should stop to retake or rechech their driving skills.

Secondly, it is justifiable to say that if people retaked driving test every 5 years, it would be able enhance global economy because costs of these types of tests are hight. According to the provided information by BBC the vast majority of countries had been increasing thier economy until 2017 but since this year retake driving test unnecessary. For instance, some countries such as Palau and Bangladesh do not have stable economy situation because people do not recheck thier driving skills on test. In my opinion, stable economy is important than mini depression of people.

In conclusion, this essay acknowledges that retake driving test has some negative and positive aspects. As fas as I concerned, despite the fact that numerous poeple can feel discomfort based on retake test, if people had started retake driving test every 5 years long ago, now global government would have stable economy.

y

2020-10-11T11:44:45.280Z

In the era of globalization and modern technologies the number of individuals who claim that dangerous sports should be forbidden have increased. I am a strong critic of this approach and I anticipate that people should be free to choose.

First of all, numerous studies have consistently found that some sports which dangerous for people such as mix fight and wrestling have been increasing significantly global economy since 2010. Moreover, if fighters of these types of sport had suitable motivations, they would receive good proceeds from battles because the vast majority of people who prefer these sports paid for performance and atmosphere. For instance, Li hao and Hol Jo boosted the Japanese economy from their battle and received a total of $ 16 million. From my point of view, dangerous sports are paramount for global economy.

Nevertheless, it is justifiable to say that without these types of sport people cannot be strong and athletic. Undoubtedly, if a person train mix fight or wrestling, he or she will have athletic chest, shoulders, arms and back because these pumped body parts are necessary for fighters. In my opinion, people should train mix fight skills instead of other not dangerous sports because without these skills people cannot be strong. Au fait, according to the provided information by BBC these sports are Indispensable for all people.

In conclusion, this essay acknowledges that dangerous sports should not be banned. As far as I am concerned, despite the fact that these types of sport are dangerous, if global government had invested to mix fight or wrestling long ago, now world would have stable economy.

udid

2020-09-28T12:48:08.855Z

In the era of globalization and modern technologies the number of individuals, who claim that technologies inventions such as mobile phones can make people more extroverted have increased. The objective of this essay is to examine and compare importantance of this approach.

First of all, numerous studies have consistently found that some messengers such as WatsApp and Viber can provide suitable conditionals for communicate with other people throughout the world. Moreover, numerous people who have messengers in their phones cannot be less interactive because these people always chat with other people. For instance, according to the provided information by BBC chatting have been using since 2010 based on this people in this decade more interactive than ten years ago. From my point of view, this type for communication more suitable and available for all people.

Secondly

In conclusion, this essay acknowledges that people cannot be less interactive. As far as I am concerned, despite the fact that technologies inventions such as mobile phones can make people more extroverted, if people have started chatting, now we would have plethora of people who do not have problems with communication.

Government should give money to creative people.

2020-09-17T16:22:33.299Z

In the era of globalization and modern technologies the number of individuals, who argue that government should provide financial to creative people such as artists and musicants have increased. The objective of this essay is to examine and compare importantance of this approach.

creative people versus normal people always evokes intresting debates. First of all, numerous studies have consistenly found that people who have creative skills more smart than people who do not have these type of skills. Moreover, if a person had creative point of view, he or she would have more perspective than a uncreative person. For instance, Hoolywood stars have more proceeds and perspective than normal people. Undoubtedly, provide money to cretive people it is suitable invest because these type of people more smart and perspective.

Secondly, it is justifable to say that creative people can enhance global economy. Furthertmore,according to the provided information by BBC the vast majority of people agree with this statement because masses believe to their ideas. To illustarte, if global government provide money to musicans or artists, these people wiil enhance global economics. From my point of view, creative people have sutable knowledge and skills for improve economy.

In conlusion, this essay acknowledges that invest money to creative people is profitable. As far as I concerned, despite the fact that creative people more smarter, if government had started to provide money to this people, now we would have suitable and stable economy.