In 2019 China is the world leader in this kind of comparing. It has a population in 1439 million. India is in second place with 1380 million a year. The third place is occupied by the USA. But the difference between second and third place is very big. It is 1049 million. The 10th position belongs to Mexico.

The second statistic is showing the expected top ten in 2100. There are some changes comparing to 2019. For example, the first and second positions are swapped. Moreover, Nigeria rose up to the third position and the USA is ranked 4th. Only Pakistan kept its 5th place.

How you could notice, the majority of positions are changed. But still, it is not absolutely correct information and only in 2100, we can check the correctness of this projection.

In my opinion, person with a lack of changes in their life will live safer and easier. There are some benefits to this type of life. They would not have a lot of unexpected problems, because they will get used to it and they will know what to do in certain situations. But there are some cons to this lifestyle. For example, if it is a famous person, he/she will be forgotten after some times. The good example of this is Vitas. He was super popular some time, but later, people bored with his songs and type of singing. That is why he is not so popular like before. If we talk about other people, for example, businessmen, they will have a threat of decreasing their income. There are a lot of examples about the cons of this lifestyle. Because of this, I think that this type of life is not correct for lots of people.

I prefer the opinion that people should do changes. There are a lot of examples where people turned down from smoking and drinking alcohol and started doing sports. Their life absolutely changed and they became more successful. Another group of people stopped spending their time for nothing and started to improve their education. Accordingly, they became more successful than before. But people can do negative changes in their life like stopping with sports, starting smoking and so on. In this case, people will ruin their life. It means that people should do correct changes, that will give a lot of benefits for them, not harms.

In conclusion, my opinion is that people should do changes if it is required. But before this, they must analyse about leadings after their changes. If they will know that turning something will improve their life, they should change whatever and whenever. Because it is never too late.

Let's look at the first one. Here we can notice that in each decade people married more comparing to divorcing. In 1970 2,5 millions of Americans married, and only one million divorced. People married around two times more than divorced. The same thing at other decades. In 1980 2,5 million marriages and around 1,4 million cases of divorcing. At the next decade number of marriage was less than before. Around 2,3 million. But still, it is much more than divorcement that is between 1,1 million. The first decade of the 21st century have shown us the least number of marriage 2 million cases. Accordingly, the least number of breaking up situations. It is 1 million divorces.

If we look at the second one, in 1970 people married more frequently than after 30 years. In 1970 70 per cent of Americans were married. It is more than in 2000 to 10 per cents. Percentage of divorced citizens were almost zero. But after 3 decades this percentage increased to 10 per cents. Moreover, we can see that in 1970 around 15 per cent of Americans never married. But in 2000 this indicator raised to 20 per cents. The last statistic that we can see is the rate of widowed women. It is around 8 per cent in 1970 and around 6 in 2000.

Talking about pros of first opinion, we can say that it will lead to less using petrol, accordingly, less using of cars. It is because of people's bad condition. I think there is no more benefits for this opinion. Moreover, it has cons like displeasure and pressure to government from citizens. We can see that it is not correct solution of this problem. So there is a question, what measures will be correct?

In my opinion, there must be alternative source of energy for cars. For example, electricity. There are some new cars like "Tesla" that are using electricity and it is ecologicaly clean. When this type of transport will become popular, government can start to increase price of petrol, because people would have alternative variation of transport that will be more profitable for them, comparing to petrol car. Because fuel for electrocars will be much cheaper than petrol.

There are a lot of variations except increasing price of petrol. Government should choose best of them and make it real. But it is not only government's job. People should turn down from their cars and spend money to change it to ecologicaly clean.

The first diagram is showing us the manufacturing cement that will be used in the next diagram. First of all, we need to pass limestone and clay through the crusher to get the powder. Then we mix it and heat it by rotating heater. After that, it goes to the grinder that will transform it into the cement. Finally, the product must be putten in bags.

The second diagram is showing us the process of creating concrete. Firstly, we should prepare water, sand, gravel or tiny stones, and cement. Concrete must consist of 10 per cent of water, fifteen per cent of cement, twenty-five per cent of sand and other fifty per cent of gravel. The last step is mixing them by rotating them in the concrete mixer.

In conclusion, we could see that manufacturing the cement is harder comparing with concrete. Moreover, it is impossible to create concrete without cement because concrete consists of fifteen per cent cement.

In the beginning, I want to highlight the most popular and less popular modes of transport. The most popular transport type of all time is the road. Between seventy and one hundred goods a year. The opposite one is the pipeline. Between zero and twenty goods a year. We have two more modes of transport, that are water and rail. in 1974 they had an almost similar number of transported goods. Specifically around forty. But after four years transporting by water became much popular than rail. Around sixty for water against thirty for rail.

In conclusion, the road is the most popular way of transporting, even nowadays. It is becoming more frequently used every year. But the pipeline is conversely. It wasn't really popular, but last time, transporting with this mode started to become more useful.

First of all, I want to discuss the reasons, why people are gaining overweight. How I said before, it is because of the lack of need in movement and our force. People eat but they don't burn the calories that they gained. It leads to the fact that they start to gain fat. Moreover, people eat unhealthy food like fast food that is even more harmful to human's fit.

To become fit, people should understand that their extra fat is harmful to them. For example, they are more assailable to a heart attack or other things that are not good to them. They would be unhardy to do some actions and some moves are really dangerous for them to do. For instance, people with extra fat shouldn't run or jump the rope. Because it is really harmful to their joints. They can get an injury and lose the ability to walk for a certain period. But if they won't move, they will become even more overweight. And there borns question, what actions should they do to keep fit?

People should start moving. They must at least walk or ride a bike. It would be better if they would start visiting the gym. Also, they must turn down from unhealthy food and bad habits. Because this reduces the benefits of sport to zero.

In conclusion, people give more responsibility to their health, because it is the thing that able to make us happy or sad.

The first pie chart is about Australia in 1980. Totally they produced one hundred units of electricity. How we can see, half of them are produced by coal. Hydro Power and natural gas are used to produce the same amount of units. Other units are generated by oil.

The second one is about Australia too. But twenty years later. At that year they got one hundred seventy units of electricity. And the majority of them are made by the coal again. but now it is about 75 per cent of the total fee. Hydro Power gave 36 units. Summary oil and natural gas gave four units of electricity. it is less than twenty years ago.

Now we can see the pie chart that gives information about France. If we look at the first one, we can see that France uses nuclear power, that was absent in Australia. In 1980 France produced ninety units of electricity. Fifty of them are due to coal and natural gas, that are produced the same number of units. Then we have twenty units by oil, fifteen by nuclear power and five by Hydro Power.

In 2000 France produced one hundred-eighty unit of electricity. It is thanks to nuclear power that produced one hundred and twenty-six unit. It is the most productive fuel for France that year. Coal and Oil produced twenty-five units each. Natural gas and Hydro Power produced the same amount too. But it is 2 units each.

Pie charts showed us that for Australia the most effective fuel is coal. But for France, it is the Nuclear Power that produced the majority of all electricity unit. Moreover, we can notice that Natural gas became irrelevant in twenty years in both countries.

Firstly I want to tell you about the first opinion. It says students need to study those lessons for their own sake. It can help people to communicate or find a solution to their problems. Also, they will become more versatile that would make graduates more demanded employee.

On the second hand, people, including me, say that graduates must learn only things that they will need at work. I agree with it because the university is not a place where students can earn extra skills. Because they must earn it from their parents or teachers from school. Most of the students come to university to pass exams and get knowledge in their direction. They ignore or sleep at the lessons because they understand that they would not use it in future. Graduates could spend their time learning something useful for their work or developing skills that they need.

In conclusion, I think students should choose extra lessons on their own. Separate useful and unuseful lessons for their future.

Let's start from pros that are really a lot. But I want to highlight some of them. I want to start with a kids motivation. When he gets support from the most significant person on their life, he will become really cherry and energised. It can push him to do his best and work hard. Also, they will know that somebody is confident on thier skills and potential. Thus, they will be more productive on their school life and self-development. Second benefit of this message is improving relationship between the parents and a child. Every pleasant message that were directed to somebody will make the relationship between them stronger.

But still, the medal has opposite side that can be really unpleasant. Firstly, I want to tell that very strong confidence can give reversed affect. It can be kid's dissapointment on themselves. If they will think that they are hardworking but there is no result, child can give up. It causes loss of confidence. To protect a kid from it, parents should give more support. Because oral support is not enough. The second possible thing, is that after fail, a kid will think that parents lied to him/her and it will ruin child's trust to their parents.

In conclusion, parents should give more support to their children that are raising and developing. Mostly, message support is not enough. That is why supporting actions are really good thing to do. They can protect them from depression that can be borned because of the fail. Thus, children will develop better and faster.