Why I asked not to list TonSafe at ton.app

I wonder why TON likes to roll out incomplete products in such a rush. Wallet P2P is far from complete. They should have looked at Cryptobot P2P and seen what are essential features and desirable features and minimum features. Serious traders aren’t going to want to use Wallet just yet. And newcomers may be discouraged. Once bitten, twice shy. First impressions count.

I test and advise for TonSafe and I do this is because TonSafe doesn’t release unfinished or buggy products. I also advised against listing on ton.app so as not to tarnish principles. It is easy to get listed at ton.app. Too easy. Submit via bot and your listing is there within a day. But TonSafe has chosen not to do this out of principles including the lack of credibility of @brainfucker ’s ton.app.

The BrainFucker (his username for real!) owns ton.app. Previously all subscriptions created with @donate were stored at data2.ton.app/api/… and Tonkeeper used to fetch data from there.

Perhaps the good people can support another good solid and honest project and join @tonsafe as well as use the product and also give some reactions to the post: https://t.me/toncoin_chat/83165 - by the way, another thing. TonSafe has not chased after marketing yet at all. Zero marketing campaigns. The product is being brought up to 2.0 before they even think of it. It’s not a rush project and not a scam. It wants to create a safe and reliable ecosystem.