StarkNet Big Mistake

I want to note right away: I received a drop. Nevertheless, I have many friends and acquaintances who worked hard all year, invested money, took risks, and helped StarkNet demonstrate to investors that the ecosystem is developing. And for all their efforts, they received...

0

Why is that? After all, they made volumes of $10,000-$20,000, completed 100 transactions, passed quests, received many NFTs, it would seem - the most genuine active network users. What could have gone wrong?

It's very simple - at the time of the snapshot, they did not have 0.005 ETH in their wallet. Moreover, if this Ethereum was there, but it was in a pool, you are out of luck just the same - that is, you were penalized for actively using ecosystem projects. You just needed to keep the Ethereum in your wallet and not move it. If your total wallet balance was $10,000, but only 0.004999 ETH of it - you're out of luck.

I've been in Discord for two days and see an endless stream of negativity towards StarkNet's decision. So to speak - collective wisdom. And, surprisingly, it's the same for everyone. Perhaps this would all have been taken for granted if the community hadn't experienced much fairer drops in the past. It's not rocket science, right? You don't even have to look far, just take Arbitrum. If you didn't have a balance - minus one point. If there was no volume - another point off. Fair? I think very much so. Then what's the reason not to use this model? Why not introduce a points system? It's so much fairer, it's like comparing primitive society and modern society. What logical reason could there be to completely overlook an active user?! Maybe I'm missing something? Explain...

It's probably safe to say that StarkNet is the disappointment of the year (in advance, despite the fact that the year has only just begun). And StarkNet decided to start its journey with bad karma, simply by deceiving its real helpers.

360,000 STRK to a wallet with 2 transactions?

The question about this wallet often comes up; how could this happen? A wallet with 2 transactions received 360,000 tokens:

While a very active wallet received 0:

Scripters got everything, workers got 0. Is this fairness?

I've also heard stories about software developers who, in total, withdrew 1,000,000 tokens. Well done, guys) But the question to StarkNet - what are you planning to do with all this?

Boycotting StarkNet!

I want to call on everyone not to leave this unnoticed, to spread the information as widely as possible, so that everyone knows the "hero" by sight. Let them have said ten times that "nobody owes anything to anyone." We all perfectly understand who owes what to whom. Everyone around should know that StarkNet scams its users. Maximum repost, maximum hate across all channels. People everywhere should learn that this project should be avoided at all costs because it's uncertain where else they might scam them. Maybe in the end, it will just be an exit scam.

Remember: rights are not given, rights are taken. Without everyone's personal participation, all this will remain unpunished, as if it were supposed to be that way. Moreover, future projects must see and understand what will happen if they treat their users this way. People are writing about it all the time: withdraw all funds from the network. StarkNet must not forget on whose shoulders it stands, that trust can be lost only once.

After all, each of us thought we were farming the project, but it turned out the project was farming us. Simply put - fraud, deception.

StarkNet -> ScamNet?

Does StarkNet really want to be remembered like this? Moreover, it would be absolutely fair if the drop criteria are not reconsidered.

Here is the link to the thread with a collection of memes, also maximum repost on Twitter https://twitter.com/aborriginal/status/1757733643798061192