4. Analysis.
Considering the same non-standard downward movement (↓388.11 - 89.59), but on the next smaller or faster chart (1 bar - 1 week) we see that the first three (↓388.11 - 300.10) also remains monowave as on the previous larger or slower chart (1 bar - 2 weeks).
This first monowave triple is followed by the X-wave ↑, which, just like on the big chart (1 bar – 2 weeks), here on the chart (1 bar – 1 week) remains monowave.
However, the second three has become more segmented here. If on the previous chart (1 bar - 2 weeks) our elongated zigzag (A-B-C) was a regular polywave, then here it turned into a complex polywave, in which its corrective phase (wave -B) segments to a simple or ordinary polywave.
As you can see, wave - B is a non-standard correction in the form of a double triple, in which the X-wave is longer than 161.8% of the length of the previous corrective wave.(The results of the measurements are visible on the graph)
It is known that the length of the pulse wave following the double
triple (3-X-3) should be at least 161.8% of the length of the previous pulse wave.
We see that our C-wave is more than 261.8% of the length of the previous pulsed A-wave.
Thus, our B-wave perfectly justifies the excessive elongation of the C-wave.