Net hooda bez dobra

Animals versus people always evokes interesting debates. In fact, in recent times the exploitation of animals has increased significantly, and numerous people believe that humans have the rights to exploitation animals, while others absolutely disagree with this statement. This essay will attempt to discuss both points of view.

With regard to the exploitation of animals, the vast majority of people have been preferring to kill animals to eat their meat since prehistoric times because their meat is useful for humans. It is justifiable to say that if a person consumed animals meal, he or she would be physically healthy. Undoubtedly, numerous people throughout the world eat exclusively meat. For instance, a person, who eat only meat would be more health than a person, who do not eat the meat. Moreover, numerous studies have consistently found that animals are necessary for human food diet. Consequently, in the hope of being healthy and strong, animals make a positive contribution to human development.

Nonetheless, other people argue that animals should have similar rights like a human. There is ample evidence to suggest that people have been starting to eat meat analog until 2010 year. Moreover, from my point of view, all people around the world should stop to eat meal because if a person consumed meal, he or she would decrease number of animals. In addition to this, people who support this belief believe that if animals suffer, the balance in the ecosystem is likely to suffer, as humans and animals must coexist in order to survive. Furthermore, ecosystem balance is paramount in this decade because animals and humans are equal.

In conclusion, this essay acknowledges that exploitation of animals has some positive and negative aspects. I strongly recommend observe ethical rules and continue to eat animals.

сейчас бы от моей инсты отписываться...