November 10, 2020

we need in other companies plagiarism protect apple creative intellectual property

Although existing cooperation relations, but in commercial interests, an apple or not hesitate before the patent to samsung wielded by big stick. Recently, apple officially to California federal appeals court in the north, among indicted samsung smartphone and tablet computer system infringe the apple many patents.

Disputes on appearance patent
According to apple's complaint shows, samsung let apple angry of the most fundamental reasons because of its top-selling among smartphone and tablet computer series "derivative" copied the iPhone and iPad design, especially in appearance. Apple spokeswoman Christine • Hugh Colgate said in a statement: "samsung's latest product from appearance to user interface, and outer packing, iPad and iPhone and is very similar. This is not coincidence. Such outright copy is wrong, we need in other companies plagiarism protect apple creative intellectual property." According to the understanding of samsung, apple put forward in 16 charges, including improper deli, infringe trademark rights and infringement of ten patents.

The prosecution against apple, samsung is stuck, samsung headquarters said, "samsung has been devoted to the research and development core technology, and strengthening independent intellectual property rights accumulation, this is the main reason for the samsung success. We will take legal means to positive response to the lawsuit act against samsung, to protect the intellectual property rights."

Lawsuit may conclude without concrete result
For the case, shenzhen war policy analyst, said Yang qun patent wars between the international brand is outspread, belong to common trade war, its purpose but the phenomenon is protect their market competition status. Although at present the apple iPhone and iPad are kept in the global market sell like hot cakes, but samsung launched last year among series of smart phones and tablet computer to apple really also brings some problems. According to statistics, last year samsung cellphone sales reached 10 million among, tablet PC also broke through 200 million, it is these two fields of apple is the most powerful competitor. "So say apple patents is using the anti-intellectual." for granted And before this, apple also once successively patent infringement lawsuit against the HTC problems, but that nokia and two opponents also in succession to apple patent problems with launched counterattack, "this patent disputes to finally are generally fudging, especially in appearance on apple's patents, more small." odds.

According to the understanding of nokia and, after apple sued HTC have failed to get the support of the international trade commission.

For counterattack apple litigation, samsung today (23) officially announced by Sue apple with patent infringement.
Previously, apple copied apple with samsung electronics technology, user interface and innovative style on the grounds of three planets the prosecution. This time, samsung sued apple, the personage inside course of study thinks may be formal counterattack with samsung chairman lee kun-hee, as saying that the "to do", is not only the apple, and even some of the electronic enterprise are now on to samsung plastic bottle cap factory electronics and expediency.

Apple 15th of this month with three rows of the technology of electronic copy apple user interface and innovative style on the grounds of samsung on the prosecution. And apple Sue samsung electronics mainly concentrated in the iPad and iphone copied aspects of design style of litigation against apple, samsung the different lawsuits on technology patents, such as samsung electronics said, apple iphone and iPad tablet computer violated samsung electronics involves style transmission and power control, efficiency transmit and wireless data communication etc 10 patents.

Apple was the biggest customer, samsung smartphone field with is also one of the biggest rivals, samsung this time action may let the two tablet computer giant jaws legal exchange more intense.