STON.fi vs DeDust

The TON blockchain has recently skyrocketed in popularity, announcing integration into Telegram, passing the whole era of TapTap games with airdrops (like Notcoin), and announcing plans for development in the United States.

So, there are 2 major DEXes on the blockchain that run only on the TON blockchain, so comparing them is acceptable. Let’s compare them in three main categories. So, STON.fi vs DeDust:

Metrics

• TVL: STON.fi — $148M; DeDust — $88M
• All time volume: STON.fi — $6.9B; DeDust — $2.2B
• UAW: STON.fi — 353K; DeDust — 118K.

User inteface

DeDust welcomes the user with a rather beautiful interface made in dark and orange colors. From a PC everything looks neat, but in my opinion it is not very intuitive. But if you check it from a mobile device, the result will be quite different — for many months, the icons of coins simply do not load on smartphones, because of which it is extremely inconvenient to navigate, by the way, even on a PC in some places remains this problem.

On STON.fi the interface is made in light and blue colors, and in my opinion looks more pleasant than on DeDust. In addition, the interface of pools conveniently describes farming programs, and the Trust Score is present on the swaps tab.

Development

STON.fi is actively developing Cross-Chain between TON and other networks. With the first planned network — Tron, a test swap has already been done. In the future it is planned to create a full-fledged Cross-Chain without bridges and wrapped tokens with the above network and EVM-compatible networks, e.g. BNB.

Also, in the future, the Omniston protocol will be compatible with these networks, which is already in beta and improves the classical swap system by preparing quotes from different liquidity sources in advance.

The DeDust Whitepaper is pretty empty, and doesn’t talk about the platform’s development plans.