Still writing for humans? Cute. AI doesn’t care about your clever headlines or flawless UX — it simply scans, extracts the core, and discards you without a hint of charm. ChatGPT, Grok, Perplexity? These are the new "power users," and they don’t click — they consume. Publishers now optimize for algorithms, not eyeballs. And brands? Some are already openly redesigning websites for AI agents. Not for people. Because people are leaving. Bots are crawling. Congratulations: the internet is no longer for humans. It’s a buffet for bots. In 2024, you’ve officially lost the internet to AI bots.
"He who thinks clearly, expresses himself clearly." I believe this phrase has never held as much value in human history as it does now. Because the primary competitive advantage in any field of human activity in the near future will be the ability to articulate one’s thoughts clearly.
It's impossible to stop being amazed. Just this morning, I came up with an idea for an interactive course in which the user not only chooses the style of narration and learning trajectory, but where the content itself would be COMPLETELY UNIQUE — something that can’t be read the same way twice. It would be about the same topic, yes, but written differently each time.
As a continuation of the conversation about what AI really is, ChatGPT offered another beautiful metaphor for how the relationship between a human and AI can unfold.Yesterday, while polishing various parts of my learning system, I decided to take a short break and asked:
When Timothy Leary wasn’t busy terrifying the U.S. government with LSD and free thinking, he came up with something seriously cool - the 8-Circuit Model of Consciousness.
These days, it’s trendy to see endless debates online about the possibilities and future of ChatGPT and other AI systems. I’d like to throw in my two cents as well. Based on my relatively short experience with ChatGPT, I’ve come to three (very much interim) conclusions: