STON.fi vs Tonnel: where is it better to farm in the TON network?
During such a quiet time in crypto, various programs of staking, farming and liquidity provide are more relevant than ever. This is a stable source of income, in which, with the proper approach, there are practically no risks. However, sometimes it’s not exactly profitable, and that’s why in this article I compared farming in liquidity pools on STON.fi and staking Telegram NFT-gifts on Tonnel. Both are on the TON blockchain, both are decentralized, but which is better?
How to avoid Impermanent losses: 5 ways
Impermanent losses (IL) are losses associated with the change in value of assets invested in the liquidity pool compared to holding those assets outside the pool. To calculate IL you must calculate how much money you would have had if you had not put it in the liquidity pool, but just held it in your wallet.
The big problem of liquidity pools
The concept of liquidity pools is an integral part of the web3 world. They provide us with a quick and convenient exchange of tokens between each other: for example, if you exchange $TON for $USDT, you deposit $TON and take $USDT from the TON/USDT pool and vice versa. The liquidity pool, in turn, regulates the number of tokens with its algorithms so that they are always in a 50/50 ratio, because the fewer tokens there are in the pool, the more the commission is charged. In fact, it is quite a clear mechanism.
STON.fi vs StormTrade
STON.fi is a DEX on the TON blockchain. StormTrade is also a DEX and on the TON blockchain too, but not everything is so simple. In this article, let’s find out why these exchanges are so different and which one you should choose for your tasks.
STON.fi vs DeDust.io
I know it’s sometimes hard to choose a DEX on which to run most of your transactions on the TON blockchain. Swaps, liquidity providing, staking: these are all things you need a DEX for. In this article, we’ll compare the two most popular exchanges on the TON network and identify the best one.